‘It's good to talk’ – judicial allocation decision making and the Family Court
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Invited paper Assessing attachment for family court decision making
Patricia McKinsey Crittenden is a Director at Family Relations Institute, Miami, Florida, USA and Adjunct Associate Professor at Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada. Dr Steve Farnfield is based at Roehampton University, London, UK. Andrea Landini is a Child and Adolescent Psychiatrist at Private Practice, Reggio Emilia, Italy. Ben Grey is a Consultant Family and Risk...
متن کاملGood Governance, (as promoting in decision-making process) and its influence on urban strategic plans
Experiences from urban development plans and assessments of their concrete and tangible results in the past decades indicate lack of adequate success of our urbanization system to responding needs of our citizens. This has resulted in need to find a fundamental solution to transforming the centralized system into decentralized. Recent changes in regard to a change of approach from master plan t...
متن کاملGender, Critical Mass, and Judicial Decision Making
We examine the role of gender in legal decision making by applying critical mass theory to the U.S. federal district courts. We analyze whether behavioral differences manifest themselves in the decision-making proclivities of male and female judges, contingent on the existence of a critical mass of female judges at a court point (i.e., each city in which a district court is located). Our result...
متن کاملCultural Bias in Judicial Decision Making
This Essay describes the phenomenon of cultural bias in judicial decision making, and examines the use of testimonies and opinions of cultural experts as a way to diminish this bias. The Essay compares the legal regimes of the United States and Israel. Whereas in the United States, the general practice of using cultural experts in courts is well developed and regulated, the Israeli legal proced...
متن کاملLay Judgments of Judicial Decision Making
This study examined laypeople’s evaluations of judicial decision making, specifically of the judicial decision-making process and the judiciary’s legitimacy. Seven-hundred participants were presented with three judicial decisions, which were portrayed as following on the heels of solid and appropriate legal procedure. Each decision was accompanied by one of four types of reasoning. Participants...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law
سال: 2015
ISSN: 0964-9069,1469-9621
DOI: 10.1080/09649069.2015.1028153